Why Your High Sensitivity Might Save Us All
These are precisely the qualities we desperately need to solve our most pressing challenges. Yet we tell sensitive people they need to "toughen up" rather than recognizing and leveraging their gifts.
With every article and podcast episode, we provide comprehensive study materials: References, Executive Summary, Briefing Document, Quiz, Essay Questions, Glossary, Timeline, Cast, FAQ, Table of Contents, Index, 3k Image, and Fact Check.
Please support my work by becoming a free subscriber. (Your subscription helps me continue providing evidence-based analysis in a media landscape increasingly hostile to inconvenient truths.)
In a world that champions the bold, the loud, and the unflappable, we've managed to overlook something crucial: some of us are wired differently. Not broken. Not weak. Just differently calibrated.
And this difference might be exactly what our chaotic world needs.
I'm talking about high sensitivity—or what researchers call Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS). It's a trait that affects roughly 15-20% of the population, cutting across gender, culture, and even species lines. And despite what our productivity-obsessed society might suggest, it's not something to "overcome" or "fix."
It might actually be our evolutionary ace in the hole.
The Science Behind the Feeling
Let's get something straight right away: this isn't about being "too emotional" or easily offended. High sensitivity is a neurobiological reality, as evidenced by brain imaging studies that show distinct patterns of neural activity in highly sensitive people.
When a highly sensitive person (HSP) walks into a crowded café, their brain doesn't just register "café." It processes the grinding espresso machine, the conversation at table three, the hint of someone's perfume, the slight draft from the door, the emotional tension between the couple in the corner, and the subtle shift in the barista's expression when they're asked to remake a drink.
All of this happens automatically, without choice, and often without conscious awareness.
Sound exhausting? It can be. But it also represents a level of information processing that offers unique advantages—advantages our ancestors likely benefited from when they needed someone in the group who could sense a predator's approach before anyone else, or detect subtle social tensions that threatened group cohesion.
The Orchid in a World Built for Dandelions
Researchers have proposed a beautiful metaphor for understanding different sensitivity levels: the orchid-dandelion theory (with tulips representing those in the middle).
Dandelions are robust. They'll grow just about anywhere. Concrete crack? No problem. Drought conditions? They'll manage. They're resilient in almost any environment.
Orchids, by contrast, are exquisitely sensitive to their environment. Place them in harsh conditions, and they wither. But give them the right care, and they bloom with spectacular beauty that dandelions can't match.
Our society is largely built for dandelions. We celebrate those who can push through discomfort, who aren't bothered by noise or chaos, who can "just deal with it." Our workplaces reward those who can endure open office plans, our schools advantage students who can filter out distractions, and our social norms often dismiss sensitivity as weakness.
But what if we're losing something irreplaceable by devaluing the orchids among us?
The Hidden Cost of a Low-Sensitivity World
When we create environments hostile to sensitivity, we don't just harm individuals—we hamstring our collective potential.
Consider what highly sensitive people bring to the table:
Deeper information processing
Enhanced awareness of subtleties
Strong empathy and emotional intelligence
Ability to detect patterns others miss
Heightened creativity and problem-solving
Greater capacity for experiencing awe and beauty
These aren't small advantages. They're precisely the qualities we desperately need to address our most pressing challenges.
Climate change? We need people who can grasp complex systems and feel deeply connected to the natural world. Social division? We need those with the empathy to bridge differences and sense unspoken needs. Technological ethics? We need minds that can anticipate subtle consequences and see beyond immediate gains.
Yet our current systems actively discourage these traits. We pathologize children who are overwhelmed by classroom chaos. We label adults "difficult" when they need accommodations for sensory processing. We tell sensitive people they need to "toughen up" rather than recognizing and leveraging their gifts.
The Science of Differential Susceptibility
Here's what makes high sensitivity particularly fascinating from a scientific perspective: it represents what researchers call "differential susceptibility."
HSPs don't just suffer more in negative environments—they actually thrive more in positive ones. Studies show they benefit more from interventions, therapy, and supportive parenting than their less sensitive counterparts.
This isn't just theory. Brain scans reveal that when shown positive images, HSPs show stronger activation in the brain's reward pathways—especially if they had nurturing childhoods. They literally experience the good more intensely, just as they do the challenging.
That's why simplistic advice to "develop a thicker skin" isn't just unhelpful—it's tragically misguided. Diminishing sensitivity means diminishing both the lows and the highs. It's like telling someone with superior color vision to wear sunglasses so they'll be less bothered by bright colors, while failing to recognize they're also seeing beauty others can't perceive.
The Personal Is Political
Understanding high sensitivity isn't just about individual well-being—though that certainly matters. It's about recognizing that diversity in neurological processing is as valuable as any other form of diversity.
When we force everyone to operate as if they're low in sensitivity, we lose vital perspectives. We design buildings, cities, workplaces, and institutions that exclude a significant portion of the population and squander their potential contributions.
Think about it: how many highly sensitive children have had their confidence crushed by being constantly told they're "too much"? How many sensitive adults have burned out trying to conform to workplace expectations built around different nervous systems? How many innovations and insights have we lost because we didn't create space for those who process the world more deeply?
The cost is incalculable.
From Understanding to Action
So what do we do with this knowledge?
First, we need to recognize sensitivity as a trait, not a flaw. It exists on a spectrum, with everyone falling somewhere between dandelion and orchid. Understanding where you and those around you fall on this spectrum can transform relationships and environments.
For HSPs themselves:
Recognize your trait as legitimate and biologically based
Develop strategies for managing overstimulation without shame
Honor your need for recovery time after intense experiences
Seek environments that allow your strengths to flourish
Recognize that deeper processing often means needing more time to reflect before responding
For those living or working with HSPs:
Respect their need for measured sensory input
Recognize their heightened awareness as valuable, not excessive
Appreciate their emotional depth rather than dismissing it
Understand that their reactions are proportionate to how their brain processes information
Create environments where their unique strengths can be leveraged
And collectively, we need to:
Design spaces with sensory diversity in mind
Develop educational approaches that accommodate different processing styles
Create workplace practices that don't penalize sensitivity
Recognize the ecological and social value of deep processing
The Sensitivity Revolution
We stand at a crossroads. Our world grows increasingly chaotic, overstimulating, and complex. The very traits that make high sensitivity challenging in our current environment—deep processing, emotional responsiveness, awareness of subtleties—are precisely what we need to navigate what's coming.
Perhaps the rise in research and awareness around high sensitivity isn't coincidental. Maybe it's an evolutionary signal that we need to reclaim and value these traits that industrial capitalism taught us to suppress and devalue.
The highly sensitive aren't defective dandelions. They're specialized instruments picking up frequencies others can't detect. In a world racing toward environmental tipping points and social fracture, we need those finely tuned instruments more than ever.
So the next time you encounter someone who seems "too sensitive"—whether it's yourself, your child, your partner, or a colleague—consider this: perhaps they're not too sensitive. Perhaps the rest of us aren't sensitive enough.
And in their deeper processing lies wisdom we desperately need.
References:
What is a highly sensitive person?
Sensory Processing Sensitivity: A Deep Dive into the Science of Highly Sensitive People
Sensory processing sensitivity and social pain: a hypothesis and theory
Find us:
YouTube
Substack
Podcast Providers
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Patreon
FaceBook Group
STUDY MATERIALS
1. Briefing Document
1. Core Concept and Definition:
Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS), often referred to as the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) trait, is described as an innate personality trait characterized by increased sensitivity to internal and external stimuli, deeper cognitive processing, and higher emotional reactivity. It is not a disorder, though it can be relevant to certain psychiatric conditions.
Source: "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity.pdf", "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
Quote: "Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) is a personality trait, not a disorder. It involves increased sensitivity to internal and external stimuli, deeper cognitive processing, and higher emotional reactivity or emotional intensity." - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity.pdf"
2. Prevalence and Distribution:
SPS is observed as a continuum from low to high sensitivity to the environment. Estimates suggest that a highly sensitive taxonic group represents approximately 10–35% of the population. While some taxometric analyses support a categorical view with a base rate of 15-20%, other research suggests a continuous distribution with individuals falling into three sensitivity groups. The question of whether SPS is truly a dimensional or categorical trait remains an important area of future research.
Source: "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
Quote: "Across populations, a continuum from low to high sensitivity to the environment is observed." and "...these findings suggest that SPS is a continuously distributed trait but that people fall into three sensitivity groups along a sensitivity continuum." - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
3. Behavioral Characteristics of High SPS Individuals:
Individuals with high SPS are more likely to:
Pause to check in novel situations.
Show heightened awareness of and attention to subtle stimuli.
Appear more reactive to both positive and negative stimuli.
Process stimuli more elaborately and learn from the information gained.
Be strongly affected by others' moods.
Conversely, those low in SPS pay less attention to subtle stimuli, approach novel situations more quickly, are less emotionally reactive, and behave with less reference to past experiences.
Source: "HSP_The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others'.pdf"
Quote: "Humans characterized as high SPS (or HSP) are likely to “pause to check” in novel situations..., show heightened awareness of and attention to subtle stimuli, and appear to be more reactive to both positive and negative stimuli..." - "HSP_The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others'.pdf"
4. Biological Basis of SPS:
Research supports a biological foundation for SPS. Key findings include:
SPS is moderately heritable.
Associations exist between SPS and cognitive, sensory, and emotional information processing in the brain.
fMRI studies indicate heightened activity in specific brain regions for individuals with higher SPS, particularly in response to emotional stimuli from close partners. These regions include those related to awareness, empathy, and motor control, such as the anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, angular gyrus, superior parietal lobe, temporoparietal junction, middle temporal gyrus, superior temporal sulcus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex, premotor area, and presupplementary motor area.
Specific brain networks like the salience network (involved in detecting salient stimuli and initiating attentional shifts) and the default mode network (active during mind-wandering and internal thought) may underlie SPS sensitivity facets.
Some research suggests a potential link between SPS and the serotonin transporter polymorphism 5-HTTLPR short/short genotype, though this connection requires further investigation.
Source: "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf", "HSP_The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others'.pdf"
Quote: "Recent findings suggest that SPS is moderately heritable..." and "Further, research has revealed associations between SPS and cognitive, sensory and emotional information processing in the brain." - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
Quote: "Across all conditions, we found activation of the PMA and premotor cingulate in association with HSP scores (controlling for neuroticism)." and "This enabled us to investigate whether individuals with greater SPS (assessed by the HSP scale, the standard measure of SPS) would show stronger activations in brain regions reflecting awareness, empathy, and motor control in response to others' emotions." - "HSP_The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others'.pdf"
5. Relationship to Other Traits and Conditions:
Temperament: SPS is conceptualized as a temperament trait, influencing emotional, motor, and attentional reactivity and self-regulation processes.
Personality: SPS has been found to be positively associated with Neuroticism (moderate effect size) and negatively associated with Extraversion in the Five-Factor Model of personality. More fine-grained analyses suggest that specific facets within these domains drive these associations. SPS also shows positive associations with Agreeableness and Openness.
Psychopathology: While not a disorder, SPS can be relevant to psychiatric disorders such as ASD, ADHD, and schizophrenia. The precise nature of these relationships (risk factor, protective factor, modifying factor, precursor, endophenotype, or transdiagnostic trait) requires further clarification.
Social Pain: SPS is hypothesized to be linked to increased sensitivity to social pain. Chronic pain, which is a highly salient stimulus, taxes similar brain networks (salience and attentional processing systems) as those involved in SPS, potentially exacerbating challenges for high SPS individuals experiencing chronic pain.
Source: "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf", "HSP_Sensory processing sensitivity and social pain: a hypothesis and theory - PMC.pdf"
Quote: "SPS is conceptualised as a temperament trait, and not a disorder." and "As a global construct, SPS has been found to be positively associated with Neuroticism with a moderate effect size... and negatively associated with the domain of Extraversion..." - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
Quote: "Relevant to the question of similarities and differences between SPS and psychiatric disorders, such as ASD, attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and schizophrenia (Acevedo et al., 2018; Ghanizadeh, 2011). However, the relationships of SPS to these disorders remain to be clarified." - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
Quote: "As a highly salient stimulus, pain constantly taxes the salience and attentional processing systems, interfering with cognitive abilities and consuming emotional and cognitive resources. Most available studies report an overlapping contribution of salience and attention networks in subjects with various chronic pain conditions and pathologies..." - "HSP_Sensory processing sensitivity and social pain: a hypothesis and theory - PMC.pdf"
6. Strengths and Challenges of Being Highly Sensitive:
While the sources don't explicitly detail all strengths and challenges, the concept implies both. The heightened awareness and deep processing, while potentially leading to overwhelm, also contribute to qualities such as:
Empathy
Creativity
A rich inner life
Vantage sensitivity: A greater susceptibility to the positive effects of favorable environments and experiences.
Challenges can include being easily overwhelmed by intense stimuli and experiencing increased emotional reactivity.
Source: "HSP_Highly sensitive person: Signs, strengths, and challenges.pdf", "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity.pdf", "HSP_The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others'.pdf", "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
Quote: "While this trait can lead to certain challenges, it also brings about positive qualities such as empathy, creativity, and as noted above, a very rich inner life." - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity.pdf"
Quote: "Vantage sensitivity: individual differences in response to positive experiences." - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf" (referencing a concept discussed in the sources)
7. Assessment of SPS:
The Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) scale, specifically an 11-item version in some studies, is the standard measure used to assess SPS. While not a medical diagnostic tool, these scales are based on research and can offer insight into an individual's sensitivity level.
Source: "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity.pdf", "HSP_The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others'.pdf"
Quote: "While this is not a medical diagnostic tool, our Free Sensitivity Profile, based on the research of Michael Pluess, PhD, Dr. Francesca Lionetti, Dr. Elaine Aron and Arthur Aron, PhD, can provide valuable insight into a person’s level of sensitivity." - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity.pdf"
Quote: "Participants completed a battery of questionnaires, including an 11-item version of the HSP scale (Aron and Aron 1997), of which the full 27-item measure has been found to be a unidimensional with alphas of 0.65–0.85 across numerous samples..." - "HSP_The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others'.pdf"
8. Coping Strategies and Intervention:
While not extensively detailed in the provided excerpts, one source mentions "Coping strategies and tips" and "Nervous System Regulation – Best Resources to Get Started." The idea of "Nervous System Regulation" suggests that managing the heightened reactivity associated with SPS is a key aspect of coping. Another source highlights "focusing on increasing an individual’s self-efficacy regarding dealing with emotions."
Source: "HSP_Highly sensitive person: Signs, strengths, and challenges.pdf", "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity.pdf", "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
Quote: "Coping strategies and tips" and "Nervous System Regulation – Best Resources to Get Started" - "HSP_Highly sensitive person: Signs, strengths, and challenges.pdf" and "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity.pdf"
Quote: "...focusing on increasing an individual’s self-efficacy regarding dealing with emotions..." - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
9. Future Research Directions:
Several key areas for future research are highlighted:
Clarifying whether SPS is a dimensional or categorical trait using state-of-the-art taxometric analyses.
Conducting longitudinal twin studies to understand genetic and environmental influences across development.
Performing molecular genetic analyses, including GWAS and polygenic risk scores.
Extending human and animal fMRI studies to examine large-scale brain networks.
Elucidating the precise relationship between SPS and psychiatric disorders.
Source: "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
Quote: "Whether SPS should be considered as a dimensional (also continuous, quantitative) or categorical (also taxonic, discrete, qualitative) trait is an important question." and outlining various future research directions. - "HSP_Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and de.pdf"
Conclusion:
SPS is a well-established personality trait with a growing body of research supporting its biological basis and its influence on how individuals interact with their environment. While it presents potential challenges related to heightened reactivity and overwhelm, it is also associated with significant strengths like empathy and creativity. Ongoing research is crucial for a more comprehensive understanding of its nature, genetic underpinnings, and its interplay with other psychological and physical conditions.
2. Quiz & Answer Key
Quiz
Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each, drawing from the provided sources.
How is Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) primarily defined according to the sources?
What is the approximate prevalence of high sensitivity in the human population?
Describe one behavioral characteristic often associated with high-SPS individuals in novel situations.
Is Sensory Processing Sensitivity considered a disorder? Explain briefly.
Name two strengths mentioned in the sources that are associated with being highly sensitive.
What is the primary method mentioned for measuring SPS in adults?
Based on fMRI research, name one brain region consistently associated with SPS.
How is SPS related to the Five-Factor Model of personality, specifically in terms of Neuroticism and Extraversion?
What is Environmental Sensitivity, and how does SPS fit within this theory?
What type of study is suggested to investigate the genetic basis of SPS across development?
Quiz Answer Key
Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) is defined as a personality trait characterized by increased sensitivity to internal and external stimuli, deeper cognitive processing, and higher emotional reactivity. It involves a greater responsiveness to environmental and social stimuli.
The approximate prevalence of high sensitivity in the human population is estimated to be about 10-35%. This is supported by various research findings, including taxometric analyses.
One behavioral characteristic is that high-SPS individuals are likely to "pause to check" in novel situations. They take more time to process stimuli before acting.
No, Sensory Processing Sensitivity is conceptualized as a personality trait, not a disorder. While it can present challenges, it is a naturally occurring variation in sensitivity.
Two strengths associated with being highly sensitive are empathy and creativity. These positive qualities are linked to deeper information processing and emotional intensity.
The primary method mentioned for measuring SPS in adults is the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) scale. An 11-item version is also used in research.
Several brain regions are associated with SPS, including the anterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, angular gyrus, temporoparietal junction, medial prefrontal cortex, and cingulate cortex.
Within the Five-Factor Model, SPS is positively associated with Neuroticism (with a moderate effect size) and negatively associated with Extraversion.
Environmental Sensitivity describes inter-individual differences in sensitivity to the environment, existing on a continuum from low to high. SPS is discussed as a much-discussed facet of Environmental Sensitivity theory.
Longitudinal twin studies, including twin-based DeFries-Fulker extremes analysis of the HSP/HSC scale, are suggested to address the question of genetic continuity and investigate the genetic basis of SPS across developmental ages.
3. Essay Questions
Discuss the debate surrounding whether Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) is a dimensional or categorical trait, using evidence from the provided sources to support your argument. Explain the implications of this distinction for future research and assessment of SPS.
Analyze the biological basis of Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) as presented in the sources. Describe the key findings from neuroimaging and genetic studies, and explain how these findings contribute to our understanding of the construct.
Explore the relationship between Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) and other psychological constructs discussed in the sources, such as temperament, personality traits (e.g., the Five-Factor Model), and psychiatric disorders. Discuss how SPS is similar to and different from these other constructs.
Evaluate the strengths and challenges associated with being a highly sensitive person (HSP) based on the provided information. How might these characteristics influence an individual's experiences in daily life and their interactions with the environment and others?
Discuss the research methods used to study Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) as described in the sources. What are some of the key findings and what future directions for research are suggested to further our understanding of SPS?
4. Glossary of Key Terms
Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS): A personality trait associated with increased sensitivity to stimuli, deeper processing, and higher emotional reactivity.
Highly Sensitive Person (HSP): An individual who scores high on measures of Sensory Processing Sensitivity.
Highly Sensitive Child (HSC): A child who scores high on measures of Sensory Processing Sensitivity.
Environmental Sensitivity: A broader theory describing individual differences in sensitivity to environmental influences, ranging from low to high sensitivity. SPS is a facet of this theory.
Dimensional Trait: A trait that exists along a continuum, with individuals differing quantitatively in their level of the trait.
Categorical Trait (Taxonic Trait): A trait where individuals can be separated into distinct, qualitatively different groups.
Neuroticism: A personality trait within the Five-Factor Model characterized by emotional instability, anxiety, and negative affect. SPS is positively associated with Neuroticism.
Extraversion: A personality trait within the Five-Factor Model characterized by sociability, assertiveness, and a preference for external stimuli. SPS is negatively associated with Extraversion.
Five-Factor Model: A widely accepted model of personality that describes five broad domains: Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness.
Temperament: Individual differences in emotional, motor, and attentional reactivity and self-regulation processes, considered to have a biological basis and appear early in life. SPS is conceptualized as a temperament trait.
fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging): A neuroimaging technique used to measure brain activity by detecting changes in blood flow. Used to study the neural correlates of SPS.
Anterior Insula: A brain region involved in processing emotions, self-awareness, and internal bodily states. Implicated in SPS.
Inferior Frontal Gyrus: A brain region involved in language processing, decision-making, and working memory. Implicated in SPS.
Angular Gyrus: A brain region involved in language, number processing, and spatial cognition. Implicated in SPS.
Temporoparietal Junction (TPJ): A brain region involved in social cognition, perspective-taking, and processing of others' actions. Implicated in SPS.
Medial Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC): A brain region involved in self-referential processing, social cognition, and decision-making. Implicated in SPS.
Cingulate Cortex: A brain region involved in emotion, learning, and memory. Implicated in SPS.
Salience Network: A large-scale brain network involved in detecting and responding to salient stimuli. Suggested to be related to heightened emotional reactivity in SPS.
Default Mode Network: A large-scale brain network active during rest and introspection, involved in self-referential thought and mind-wandering. Suggested to be related to deep cognitive processing in SPS.
Taxometric Analysis: A statistical method used to determine whether a psychological construct is best described as a dimension or a category.
Heritability: The proportion of variation in a trait that is attributable to genetic factors. SPS is considered moderately heritable.
GWAS (Genome-Wide Association Study): A study that scans the entire genome for common genetic variants associated with a particular trait or disease. Suggested for future SPS research.
Polygenic Risk Score: A score that summarizes the cumulative effect of multiple genetic variants on an individual's risk for a particular trait or disease. Suggested for future SPS research.
Differential Susceptibility: The idea that individuals vary in the extent to which they are affected by both positive and negative environmental influences. Related to Environmental Sensitivity and SPS.
Vantage Sensitivity: The idea that individuals vary in the extent to which they benefit from positive experiences. Related to Environmental Sensitivity and SPS.
Sensory Processing Disorders: A group of conditions that cause changes in the way the brain processes sensory information. SPS is distinct from these disorders.
Social Anxiety Disorder: Excessive emotional discomfort, anxiety, fear, or worry about social situations. Discussed in relation to conditions reviewed in the sources, though its direct link to SPS is not explicitly detailed as a defining feature of SPS itself.
5. Timeline of Main Events
1996: Research begins to emerge connecting premotor cortex activity to the recognition of motor actions, a concept later relevant to understanding brain activity in SPS. (Rizzolatti et al., 1996)
1997: Elaine Aron and Arthur Aron introduce the concept of Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) and develop the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) scale as a measure for this trait in human adults. (Aron and Aron, 1997)
1999: Research on coping styles in animals, noting individual differences in behavior and stress physiology, supports the idea of inherent traits affecting environmental responses. (Koolhaas et al., 1999)
2000: Research highlights the prefrontal cortex's role in cognitive control, a brain region potentially involved in the deeper processing characteristic of SPS. (Miller, 2000)
2001: Research begins to map the anterior cingulate cortex's role in brain activity, potentially linking it to aspects of SPS. (Paus, 2001)
2002: Studies on illusory own-body perceptions through brain stimulation provide insights into sensory processing, relevant to understanding the heightened sensory awareness in SPS. (Blanke et al., 2002)
2002: Research starts to map the functional neuroanatomy of emotion through meta-analyses of PET and fMRI studies, providing a foundation for later studies on emotional reactivity in SPS. (Phan et al., 2002)
2004: Rizzolatti and Craighero publish a review on the mirror-neuron system, linking it to understanding others' actions and potentially relevant to empathy in SPS. (Rizzolatti and Craighero, 2004)
2005: Research links maternal personality to perceptions of environmental chaos, suggesting a potential interplay between personality and environmental perception, relevant to SPS as a trait influencing environmental sensitivity. (Meyer et al., 2005; Benham, 2006; Hofmann and Bitran, 2007)
2005: Research on functional MRI reveals brain blood flow patterns under psychological stress, relevant to the stress responses in individuals with SPS. (Wang et al., 2005)
2006: Benham publishes research specifically examining stress and physical symptom reports in highly sensitive persons. (Benham, 2006)
2006: Cross et al. study brain activity during observation of dance by dancers, providing further insight into motor simulation and empathy. (Cross et al., 2006)
2007: Hofmann and Bitran's work contributes to the psychometric evaluation of the HSP scale. (Hofmann and Bitran, 2007)
2008: Wolf, Van Doorn, and Weissing publish work on the evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities, offering a theoretical framework for SPS as an evolutionary trait. (Wolf et al., 2008)
2008: Evers, Rasche, and Schabracq study high sensory processing sensitivity in a work context. (Evers et al., 2008)
2009: Craig reviews the anterior insula's role in human awareness, a brain region later found to be active in individuals with higher SPS. (Craig, 2009)
2009: Jedema et al. investigate the cognitive impact of genetic variation in the serotonin transporter in primates, suggesting a genetic basis for traits influencing behavior. (Jedema et al., 2009)
2009: Binder et al. conduct a critical review and meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies related to the semantic system, contributing to the understanding of cognitive processing in the brain. (Binder et al., 2009)
2009: Belsky and Pluess introduce the concept of differential susceptibility to environmental influences, a key theoretical framework within which SPS is discussed. (Belsky and Pluess, 2009)
2010: Obradović et al. study biological sensitivity to context in children, examining the interactive effects of stress reactivity and family adversity, providing evidence for individual differences in environmental sensitivity early in life. (Obradović et al., 2010)
2010: Way and Taylor explore social influences on health and the potential role of serotonin as a critical mediator, relevant to the biological underpinnings of SPS. (Way and Taylor, 2010)
2010: Ramchandani et al. investigate differential susceptibility to fathers' care and its potential influence on development. (Ramchandani et al., 2010)
2011: Jagiellowicz, Xu, Aron, Aron, Cao, Feng, and Weng publish a study linking the trait of sensory processing sensitivity to neural responses to changes in visual scenes. (Jagiellowicz et al., 2011)
2011: Chen et al. investigate the contributions of dopamine-related genes and environmental factors to highly sensitive personality, suggesting a genetic component to SPS. (Chen et al., 2011)
2011: Licht, Mortensen, and Knudsen find an association between sensory processing sensitivity and the serotonin transporter polymorphism 5-HTTLPR short/short genotype, further supporting a biological basis for SPS. (Licht et al., 2011)
2011: Huber et al. discuss how "health" should be defined, providing context for understanding SPS as a trait rather than a disorder. (Huber et al., 2011)
2011: Ellis et al. contribute to the understanding of environmental sensitivity in the context of evolutionary psychology and child development. (Ellis et al., 2011)
2011: Lamm, Decety, and Singer conduct a meta-analysis of neural networks associated with pain and empathy for pain, relevant to understanding the emotional processing in SPS. (Lamm et al., 2011)
2012: Borries conducts a Diploma thesis on SPS using taxometric analyses, suggesting a highly sensitive taxonic group with a specific base rate, although this was not replicated in a later study. (Borries, 2012)
2012: Lu et al. report that rat brains also have a default mode network, providing a comparative perspective for brain network research in SPS. (Lu et al., 2012)
2012: Rizzo-Sierra and Leon-Sarmiento explore the link between higher sensory processing sensitivity, introversion, ectomorphism, and creativity in rural areas. (Rizzo-Sierra et al., 2012)
2012: Jagiellowicz, Xu, Aron, Aron, Cao, Feng, and Weng publish further research on the trait of sensory processing sensitivity and neural responses. (Jagiellowicz et al., 2012)
2012: Schoebi, Way, Karney, and Bradbury study genetic moderation of sensitivity to positive and negative affect in marriage, relevant to how SPS might influence relationships. (Schoebi et al., 2012)
2013: Pluess and Belsky introduce the concept of "Vantage Sensitivity," focusing on individual differences in response to positive experiences, expanding the differential susceptibility framework. (Pluess and Belsky, 2013)
2013: Luoni et al. investigate the behavioral and neuroplastic properties of chronic lurasidone treatment in serotonin transporter knockout rats, relevant to the neurobiological basis of SPS. (Luoni et al., 2013)
2014: The American Psychiatric Association publishes its diagnostic manual, providing a benchmark for understanding clinical disorders distinct from personality traits like SPS. (American Psychiatric Association, 2013)
2014: Insel discusses the NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project, highlighting the shift towards precision medicine for psychiatry and potentially influencing future research on transdiagnostic traits like SPS. (Insel, 2014)
2014: Cauda et al. publish on chronic pain and its effects on brain networks, relevant to understanding how sensory processing can be affected in various conditions. (Cauda et al., 2014)
2014: Bruining et al. study behavioral signatures related to genetic disorders in autism, a condition sometimes discussed in relation to sensory processing differences. (Bruining et al., 2014)
2015: Pluess reviews individual differences in environmental sensitivity, highlighting SPS as a key aspect. (Pluess, 2015)
2015: Brindle, Moulding, Bakker, and Nedeljkovic explore whether emotional regulation mediates the relationship between sensory processing sensitivity and negative affect. (Brindle et al., 2015)
2015: Sierra et al. study default mode and other brain networks in rats, providing comparative insights for brain research in SPS. (Sierakowiak et al., 2015)
2015: Rotge et al. conduct a meta-analysis on the anterior cingulate cortex's contribution to social pain, a concept potentially linked to the heightened social sensitivity in SPS. (Rotge et al., 2015)
2015: Kroenung's Master's thesis fails to replicate previous taxometric findings suggesting a categorical grouping for SPS. (Kroenung, 2015)
2015: Pluess and Boniwell find that Sensory-Processing Sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program, suggesting "vantage sensitivity." (Pluess and Boniwell, 2015)
2016: Asscher et al. investigate whether personality traits affect the responsiveness of juvenile delinquents to treatment, highlighting the importance of personality in intervention outcomes. (Asscher et al., 2016)
2016: Boterberg and Warreyn use a questionnaire with items overlapping with the HSC questionnaire to examine the association of sensitivity with daily functioning in a Dutch sample of children. (Boterberg and Warreyn, 2016)
2016: Pennisi writes about "The power of personality," emphasizing the significance of individual traits. (Pennisi, 2016)
2016: Jagiellowicz, Aron, and Aron study the relation between the temperament trait of sensory processing sensitivity and emotional reactivity. (Jagiellowicz et al., 2016)
2016: Listou Grimen and Diseth find positive associations between SPS and Neuroticism and negative associations with Extraversion. (Listou Grimen and Diseth, 2016)
2016: Huang et al. study inter-strain differences in the default mode network in rats, providing further comparative data for brain network research. (Huang et al., 2016)
2017: Acevedo et al. publish an fMRI study on sensory processing sensitivity and response to others' emotions, specifically focusing on brain activity when viewing pictures of romantic partners and strangers with different facial expressions. (Acevedo et al., 2017)
2017: Assary, Vincent, Keers, and Pluess review gene-environment interaction and psychiatric disorders, providing context for understanding how SPS might interact with environmental factors. (Assary et al., 2017)
2017: Sandin et al. study the heritability of autism spectrum disorder, a condition sometimes discussed in relation to sensory processing differences. (Sandin et al., 2017)
2017: Şengül-İnal and Sümer explore the multidimensional structure of sensory processing sensitivity in Turkish samples, contributing to cross-cultural understanding of the trait. (Şengül-İnal and Sümer, 2017)
2017: Carr and Nielsen propose a novel Differential Susceptibility framework for the study of nightmares, providing evidence for trait sensory processing sensitivity. (Carr and Nielsen, 2017)
2017: Slagt et al. study sensory processing sensitivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to parenting. (Slagt et al., 2017)
2017: Hein et al. study frequency-specific electrophysiologic correlates of resting state fMRI networks. (Hein et al., 2017)
2017: Robertson and Baron-Cohen review sensory perception in autism, highlighting the importance of sensory differences in neurodevelopmental conditions. (Robertson and Baron-Cohen, 2017)
2018: Assary, Zavos, Krapohl, Keers, and Pluess conduct research suggesting that sensitivity to the environment has two distinct heritable components (in preparation). (Assary et al., in preparation)
2018: Bridges completes a doctoral dissertation on neurosensitivity, exploring implications for cognition and creativity. (Bridges, 2018)
2018: Bridges and Schendan publish studies suggesting that sensitive individuals are more creative. (Bridges and Schendan, in press, a; Bridges and Schendan, in press, b)
2018: Rinn, Mullet, Jett, and Nyikos conduct a psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person scale among high-ability individuals. (Rinn et al., 2018)
2018: Robbins offers an opinion on monoaminergic contributions to traits and temperament, relevant to the biological basis of SPS. (Robbins, 2018)
2019: Assary et al. publish findings suggesting that SPS is moderately heritable. (Assary et al., 2019)
2019: Weyn et al. study the psychometric properties of the Highly Sensitive Person scale (under review). (Weyn et al., under review)
2021: Bozzatello et al. conduct fMRI studies related to borderline personality disorder, a condition that may have overlapping features with some aspects of SPS in terms of emotional reactivity. (Bozzatello et al., 2021; Bozzatello et al., 2019)
2021: Schwarz, Feike, and Stangier study mental imagery and social pain in adolescents, relevant to the experience of individuals with higher SPS. (Schwarz et al., 2021)
2022: Palermo discusses neurocognition and placebo analgesia in the context of functional magnetic resonance imaging, providing further insight into brain activity related to perception and experience. (Palermo, 2022)
2023: Pluess, Lionetti, Aron, and Aron publish an integrated theory, measurement, and empirical evidence for the idea that people differ in their sensitivity to the environment, consolidating key aspects of SPS research. (Pluess et al., 2023)
Cast of Characters:
Elaine Aron: A key researcher in the field of Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS), co-developer of the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) scale in 1997. Her work forms the foundation of much of the research on SPS.
Arthur Aron: A key researcher in the field of Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS), co-developer of the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) scale in 1997. His work, often in collaboration with Elaine Aron, is central to the understanding and measurement of SPS.
Michael Pluess, PhD: A prominent researcher in the field of Sensory Processing Sensitivity and Environmental Sensitivity. His research focuses on individual differences in response to the environment, including "differential susceptibility" and "vantage sensitivity." He is credited with providing the basis for a "Free Sensitivity Profile."
Francesca Lionetti, Dr.: A researcher collaborating with Michael Pluess, Elaine Aron, and Arthur Aron on the integrated theory and measurement of Sensory Processing Sensitivity.
J. Belsky: A researcher who has collaborated with Michael Pluess on the concepts of differential susceptibility and vantage sensitivity, key frameworks for understanding how individuals with SPS respond to environmental influences.
Heidi Moawad, M.D.: A medical reviewer for Healthline, providing medical review for content related to sensory processing disorders.
Jennifer Litner, PhD, LMFT, CST: A medical reviewer for Healthline, providing medical review for content related to social anxiety disorder.
Marney A. White, PhD, MS: A medical reviewer for Healthline, providing medical review for content related to mild depression.
J. Jagiellowicz: A researcher who has conducted studies on the trait of sensory processing sensitivity, including its relation to neural responses and emotional reactivity, often in collaboration with Elaine and Arthur Aron.
E. Assary: A researcher who has contributed to the understanding of the heritability of environmental sensitivity and gene-environment interaction in psychiatric disorders, relevant to the biological basis of SPS.
D. Bridges: A researcher whose doctoral work and publications explore the implications of neurosensitivity for cognition and creativity, suggesting a link between sensitivity and creative abilities.
H.E. Schendan: A collaborator with D. Bridges on research into neurosensitivity and creativity.
R. Moulding: A researcher who has studied the relationship between sensory-processing sensitivity, mindfulness, and negative psychological symptoms, as well as the role of emotional regulation.
K. Bakker: A researcher who has collaborated with R. Moulding on studies related to sensory-processing sensitivity and emotional regulation.
M. Nedeljkovic: A researcher who has collaborated with Brindle, Moulding, and Bakker on studies related to sensory-processing sensitivity and emotional regulation.
H. Bruining: A researcher who has studied autism spectrum disorders and behavioral signatures related to genetic disorders, relevant to the discussion of SPS in the context of psychopathology.
M. J. Eijkermans: A collaborator with H. Bruining on research related to autism spectrum disorders.
M. J. Kas: A collaborator with H. Bruining on research related to autism spectrum disorders.
S. R. Curran: A collaborator with H. Bruining on research related to autism spectrum disorders.
J. A. Vorstman: A collaborator with H. Bruining on research related to autism spectrum disorders.
P. F. Bolton: A collaborator with H. Bruining on research related to autism spectrum disorders.
F. Cauda: A researcher who has studied chronic pain and its effects on brain networks, contributing to the understanding of sensory processing differences in various conditions.
S. Palermo: A researcher whose work focuses on neurocognition and placebo analgesia, relevant to understanding the subjective experience of pain and other stimuli.
J. Obradović: A researcher who has studied biological sensitivity to context in children, highlighting early individual differences in environmental responsiveness.
N. R. Bush: A collaborator with J. Obradović on research related to biological sensitivity to context.
J. Stamperdahl: A collaborator with J. Obradović on research related to biological sensitivity to context.
N. E. Adler: A collaborator with J. Obradović on research related to biological sensitivity to context.
W. T. Boyce: A collaborator with J. Obradović on research related to biological sensitivity to context.
P. Bozzatello: A researcher who has conducted fMRI studies related to borderline personality disorder, contributing to the understanding of emotional processing and brain function in psychiatric conditions.
R. Morese: A collaborator with P. Bozzatello on fMRI studies related to borderline personality disorder.
M. C. Valentini: A collaborator with P. Bozzatello on fMRI studies related to borderline personality disorder.
P. Rocca: A collaborator with P. Bozzatello on fMRI studies related to borderline personality disorder.
S. Bellino: A collaborator with P. Bozzatello on fMRI studies related to borderline personality disorder.
F. Bosco: A collaborator with P. Bozzatello on fMRI studies related to borderline personality disorder.
P. G. Ramchandani: A researcher who has studied differential susceptibility to fathers' care.
M. V. Jzendoorn: A collaborator with P. G. Ramchandani on research related to differential susceptibility.
M. J. Bakermans-Kranenburg: A collaborator with P. G. Ramchandani on research related to differential susceptibility.
J. Y. Rotge: A researcher who has conducted meta-analyses on the anterior cingulate cortex and social pain.
C. Lemogne: A collaborator with J. Y. Rotge on meta-analyses related to social pain.
S. Hinfray: A collaborator with J. Y. Rotge on meta-analyses related to social pain.
P. Huguet: A collaborator with J. Y. Rotge on meta-analyses related to social pain.
O. Grynszpan: A collaborator with J. Y. Rotge on meta-analyses related to social pain.
E. Tartour: A collaborator with J. Y. Rotge on meta-analyses related to social pain.
S. M. Schwarz: A researcher who has studied mental imagery and social pain in adolescents.
M. Feike: A collaborator with S. M. Schwarz on research related to social pain in adolescents.
U. Stangier: A collaborator with S. M. Schwarz on research related to social pain in adolescents.
G. Benham: A researcher whose work specifically investigated stress and physical symptom reports in highly sensitive persons.
H. Hofmann: A researcher who has contributed to the psychometric evaluation of the HSP scale.
R. Bitran: A researcher who has contributed to the psychometric evaluation of the HSP scale.
X. Xu: A collaborator with Jagiellowicz, Elaine Aron, and Arthur Aron on research related to SPS and neural responses.
G. Cao: A collaborator with Jagiellowicz, Elaine Aron, and Arthur Aron on research related to SPS and neural responses.
T. Feng: A collaborator with Jagiellowicz, Elaine Aron, and Arthur Aron on research related to SPS and neural responses.
X. Weng: A collaborator with Jagiellowicz, Elaine Aron, and Arthur Aron on research related to SPS and neural responses.
C. Chen: A researcher who has investigated the genetic contributions to highly sensitive personality.
R. Moyzis: A collaborator with C. Chen on research related to genetic contributions to personality.
H. Stern: A collaborator with C. Chen on research related to genetic contributions to personality.
H. He: A collaborator with C. Chen on research related to genetic contributions to personality.
H. Li: A collaborator with C. Chen on research related to genetic contributions to personality.
C. Licht: A researcher who has found an association between sensory processing sensitivity and a serotonin transporter polymorphism.
E. L. Mortensen: A collaborator with C. Licht on research related to SPS and serotonin.
G. M. Knudsen: A collaborator with C. Licht on research related to SPS and serotonin.
M. Wolf: A researcher who has studied the evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities.
S. Van Doorn: A collaborator with M. Wolf on research related to the evolution of personalities.
F. J. Weissing: A collaborator with M. Wolf on research related to the evolution of personalities.
A. Evers: A researcher who has studied high sensory processing sensitivity in a work context.
J. Rasche: A collaborator with A. Evers on research related to SPS at work.
M. J. Schabracq: A collaborator with A. Evers on research related to SPS at work.
H. Bruining: (Also listed previously) Researched autism spectrum disorders and genetic influences.
M. J. Eijkermans: (Also listed previously) Collaborated with H. Bruining.
M. J. Kas: (Also listed previously) Collaborated with H. Bruining.
S. R. Curran: (Also listed previously) Collaborated with H. Bruining.
J. A. Vorstman: (Also listed previously) Collaborated with H. Bruining.
P. F. Bolton: (Also listed previously) Collaborated with H. Bruining.
A. Asscher: Researched the effect of personality traits on responsiveness to treatment in juvenile delinquents.
M. Dekovic: A collaborator with A. Asscher and M. Slagt on research related to personality and responsiveness.
A. L. Den Akker: A collaborator with A. Asscher on research related to personality and responsiveness.
W. A. Manders: A collaborator with A. Asscher on research related to personality and responsiveness.
P. J. Prins: A collaborator with A. Asscher on research related to personality and responsiveness.
P. H. Van Der Laan: A collaborator with A. Asscher on research related to personality and responsiveness.
P. Prinzie: A collaborator with A. Asscher on research related to personality and responsiveness.
J. Boterberg: A researcher who has used questionnaires to study sensitivity in children.
K. Warreyn: A collaborator with J. Boterberg on research related to sensitivity in children.
A. N. Rinn: A researcher who has conducted psychometric evaluations of the HSP scale among high-ability individuals.
D. R. Mullet: A collaborator with A. N. Rinn on psychometric evaluations of the HSP scale.
N. Jett: A collaborator with A. N. Rinn on psychometric evaluations of the HSP scale.
T. Nyikos: A collaborator with A. N. Rinn on psychometric evaluations of the HSP scale.
T. Robbins: Provided an opinion on monoaminergic contributions to traits and temperament.
S. Sandin: Researched the heritability of autism spectrum disorder.
P. Lichtenstein: A collaborator with S. Sandin on research related to the heritability of autism spectrum disorder.
R. Kuja-Halkola: A collaborator with S. Sandin on research related to the heritability of autism spectrum disorder.
C. Hultman: A collaborator with S. Sandin on research related to the heritability of autism spectrum disorder.
H. Larsson: A collaborator with S. Sandin on research related to the heritability of autism spectrum disorder.
A. Reichenberg: A collaborator with S. Sandin on research related to the heritability of autism spectrum disorder.
G. Şengül-İnal: Researched the multidimensional structure of sensory processing sensitivity in Turkish samples.
N. Sümer: A collaborator with G. Şengül-İnal on research related to sensory processing sensitivity.
M. Carr: Researched differential susceptibility and nightmares, finding evidence for trait sensory processing sensitivity.
T. Nielsen: A collaborator with M. Carr on research related to nightmares and sensory processing sensitivity.
M. Slagt: Researched sensory processing sensitivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to parenting.
J. S. Dubas: A collaborator with M. Slagt on research related to parenting and differential susceptibility.
M. A. van Aken: A collaborator with M. Slagt on research related to parenting and differential susceptibility.
B. J. Ellis: A collaborator with M. Slagt on research related to parenting and differential susceptibility, and contributed to environmental sensitivity theory.
M. Dekovic: (Also listed previously) Collaborated with M. Slagt.
N. Hein: A researcher who has studied frequency-specific electrophysiologic correlates of resting state fMRI networks.
J. A. Rudd: A collaborator with N. Hein on research related to fMRI networks.
L. Schroeter: A collaborator with N. Hein on research related to fMRI networks.
B. L. Etzel: A collaborator with N. Hein on research related to fMRI networks.
A. Keil: A collaborator with N. Hein on research related to fMRI networks.
C. E. Robertson: A researcher who has reviewed sensory perception in autism.
S. Baron-Cohen: A collaborator with C. E. Robertson on research related to sensory perception in autism.
S. Weyn: A researcher studying the psychometric properties of the Highly Sensitive Person scale.
K. Van Leuuwen: A collaborator with S. Weyn on research related to the HSP scale.
F. Lionetti: (Also listed previously) Collaborated with S. Weyn and Michael Pluess.
C. Greven: A collaborator with S. Weyn on research related to the HSP scale.
L. Goosens: A collaborator with S. Weyn on research related to the HSP scale.
C. V. Rizzo-Sierra: Researched the biological implications of human sensory processing sensitivity for introversion, submission, and creativity.
M. E. Leon-S: A collaborator with C. V. Rizzo-Sierra on research related to SPS and creativity.
F. E. Leon-Sarmiento: A collaborator with C. V. Rizzo-Sierra on research related to SPS and creativity.
6. FAQ
What is Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS)?
Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS), also commonly referred to in humans as being a Highly Sensitive Person (HSP), is conceptualized as an innate temperament trait. It is associated with greater sensitivity and responsiveness to both internal and external stimuli. This can involve deeper cognitive processing and a higher level of emotional reactivity or intensity. While it can present challenges, it is also linked to positive qualities such as empathy and creativity. This trait is not considered a disorder.
What are the signs or characteristics of someone with high SPS?
Individuals with high SPS often exhibit increased sensitivity to environmental and social stimuli. This means they may be more aware of subtle cues in their surroundings and more strongly affected by others' moods and emotional displays. They tend to process information more deeply, which can lead to more elaborate responses and a tendency to "pause to check" in novel situations. They may also be more emotionally reactive to both positive and negative stimuli.
Is SPS a common trait?
Research suggests that SPS is present in approximately 10-35% of the population. While it is considered a continuous trait, meaning individuals fall along a spectrum of sensitivity, some research indicates that people may cluster into distinct sensitivity groups. This trait has also been observed in over 100 nonhuman species.
How is SPS related to personality traits?
Studies have found associations between SPS and certain personality traits, particularly within the Five-Factor Model. SPS is often positively associated with Neuroticism (with a moderate effect size) and negatively associated with Extraversion. More detailed analyses suggest that these associations are driven by specific facets within these broader personality domains.
What is the biological basis of SPS?
Research points towards a biological foundation for SPS. Studies have shown associations between SPS and differences in cognitive, sensory, and emotional information processing in the brain. Functional MRI (fMRI) studies have revealed increased activity in brain regions related to awareness, empathy, and motor control in individuals with higher SPS, particularly in response to emotional stimuli from close partners. Specific brain networks, like the salience network and default mode network, may also play a role. There is also evidence suggesting that SPS is moderately heritable and potentially associated with genetic variants, such as those related to serotonin.
Is SPS a disorder, or is it related to other conditions?
SPS is conceptualized as a temperament trait, not a disorder. However, research is exploring its potential relationships with various psychiatric disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and schizophrenia. It is being investigated whether SPS could act as a risk or protective factor, influence symptom expression, or be a transdiagnostic trait across different conditions.
How can SPS be measured?
While not a medical diagnostic tool, instruments like the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) scale have been developed to assess individual levels of sensory processing sensitivity. These scales often include items related to being easily overwhelmed by stimuli, being affected by others' moods, and noticing subtle details. Research using such scales has been instrumental in examining the behavioral and neural correlates of SPS.
How does SPS influence responses to positive and negative experiences?
Individuals high in SPS tend to show increased responsiveness to both positive and negative environmental stimuli. This concept is sometimes referred to as "differential susceptibility" or "vantage sensitivity," suggesting that those with high SPS are more profoundly affected by their environment, whether it is highly supportive or challenging. This means they may benefit more from positive experiences and interventions, but also be more negatively impacted by adverse ones.
7. Table of Contents
Introduction (00:00 - 00:55)
Welcome to Heliox's Deep Dive exploring high sensitivity (sensory processing sensitivity), a trait found in approximately 15-20% of the population. The hosts establish that this is a personality trait, not a disorder.
What is High Sensitivity? (00:56 - 02:59)
Definition of high sensitivity and its research terminology (HSP vs. SPS). Explanation that it's a natural personality variation rather than a medical condition, with discussion of evolutionary advantages of heightened awareness.
Signs and Experiences (03:00 - 06:05)
Everyday examples of high sensitivity, including heightened awareness of sensory input, being easily overwhelmed, deep emotional processing, and strong empathy. Discussion of how sensitivity manifests in various contexts.
Awareness vs. Change (06:06 - 07:02)
Exploration of whether sensitivity has increased in modern times or if we simply have better awareness and language to describe it now.
Benefits and Strengths (07:03 - 09:13)
Examination of the positive aspects of high sensitivity, including deep empathy, noticing important details, and the importance of working with the trait rather than trying to eliminate it.
Scientific Basis (09:14 - 11:44)
Overview of the biological foundations of SPS, including heritability, evolutionary conservation, and how sensitive individuals process information more thoroughly, with explanation of differential susceptibility.
Sensitivity Models (11:45 - 14:06)
Discussion of different theoretical models for understanding environmental sensitivity, including differential susceptibility, biological sensitivity to context, and the orchid-dandelion-tulip metaphor.
Research Findings (14:07 - 16:26)
Exploration of studies showing how high SPS interacts with childhood experiences, environmental factors, and interventions, with evidence that sensitive individuals respond more strongly to both positive and negative stimuli.
Measurement and Spectrum (16:27 - 17:57)
Information about how SPS is measured through questionnaires and the debate about whether sensitivity is categorical or exists on a spectrum (with recent evidence supporting the spectrum view).
Personality Correlations (17:58 - 20:50)
Analysis of how SPS relates to other personality frameworks, including Eysenck's model, Gray's theory, and the Big Five traits, emphasizing that while SPS overlaps with traits like neuroticism and introversion, it captures something distinct.
Biological Mechanisms (20:51 - 24:47)
In-depth look at the genetics, brain imaging, and cognitive processing research related to SPS, including findings about brain activation patterns, attention differences, and animal models.
Life Outcomes (24:48 - 27:01)
Discussion of how high sensitivity affects life experiences, including both challenges (risk for anxiety/depression) and benefits (creativity, awe, positive emotions), plus insights about sensitive people as parents.
Support and Interventions (27:02 - 28:16)
Recommendations for supporting highly sensitive individuals through building self-efficacy, emotion regulation, psychoeducation, and tailored therapeutic approaches.
Key Takeaways (28:17 - 29:52)
Summary of the most important points: high sensitivity is biologically real, affects many aspects of life with both challenges and strengths, and understanding the trait can be empowering for improved well-being.
Conclusion (29:53 - 30:20)
Final thoughts on the value of different ways of experiencing the world and information about further resources.
8. Index
Aesthetic sensitivity, 22:07
Amygdala, 22:48
Anxiety, 19:05, 25:14
Aron, Elaine, 01:36, 03:27, 13:10, 16:47
Attention, 21:28, 23:22
Awareness, 06:11, 18:35
Behavioral inhibition system, 19:19
Biological basis, 09:17, 20:51
Biological sensitivity to context, 12:19, 13:09
Big Five traits, 19:40, 22:15
Brain imaging, 11:00, 21:07, 22:04
Candidate genes, 21:01
Childhood experiences, 14:20, 14:58, 22:36, 25:34
Creativity, 26:01
Deep processing, 02:54, 09:42, 19:02, 23:29, 29:00
Differential susceptibility, 12:09, 12:24, 13:38
Dopamine systems, 21:04, 22:54
DSM-5, 01:42
Emotion regulation, 25:59, 27:33
Emotional sensitivity, 04:54, 05:03
Empathy, 05:06, 07:29, 22:19, 29:05
Environment, impact of, 10:15, 14:14, 22:40
Evolution, 09:20, 10:08
Extroversion, 18:55, 19:45, 22:18
FMRI studies, 11:00, 21:20
Genetics, 09:18, 20:51, 22:56
Gray's theory, 19:12
Heliox, 00:01
Heritability, 09:17
Highly sensitive child scale (HSC), 17:33
Highly sensitive person (HSP), 01:38, 16:46
Highly sensitive person scale (HSP scale), 16:46
HPA axis, 23:57
Implicit learning, 23:37
Introversion, 04:18, 18:42, 19:45
Neuroticism, 18:54, 19:45, 22:17
Openness to experience, 19:50, 22:18
Orchid and dandelion metaphor, 14:07, 14:35
Orchid-tulip-dandelion metaphor, 14:45
Overstimulation, 04:12, 04:21, 13:16
Parenting, sensitive, 25:40, 25:50
Personality trait, 01:07, 01:20, 13:15, 29:00
Positive emotions, 25:22, 26:00
Precuneus, 22:55
Prevention, 27:59
Psychoeducation, 28:00
Resilience, 27:32
Reward pathways, 22:32
Sensory overload, 02:22, 23:56, 26:27
Sensory processing disorder, 01:41
Sensory processing sensitivity (SPS), 00:52, 01:38, 09:29, 13:10, 21:45, 23:06
Serotonin systems, 21:02, 23:13
Social cues, 02:49, 05:12
Spectrum, sensitivity as a, 17:40, 17:52
Support, 08:31, 27:03, 27:19, 28:07
Temperament trait, 11:36
Therapy, 08:33, 26:16, 27:09
Twin studies, 20:58
Withdrawal time, 05:35
9. Post-Episode Fact Check
After reviewing the podcast transcript on high sensitivity and sensory processing sensitivity, I can confirm that the content is generally factually accurate and aligns with current research. Here are my findings:
Accuracy of core concepts: The podcast correctly describes sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) as a personality trait affecting approximately 15-20% of the population, not a disorder or condition requiring treatment. This aligns with the scientific literature.
Attribution to Elaine Aron: The hosts correctly attribute the term "highly sensitive person" (HSP) to psychologist Elaine Aron, who pioneered research in this area.
Measurement tools: The description of the HSP Scale (27 items) and HSC Scale (12 items) as measurement tools is accurate.
Biological basis: The discussion of the biological underpinnings of high sensitivity, including genetic components, brain imaging studies, and physiological responses is supported by research.
Differential susceptibility: The explanation of differential susceptibility theory (that highly sensitive people are more affected by both positive and negative environments) is consistent with the scientific literature.
Orchid-dandelion metaphor: The description of this metaphor (and the more recent addition of tulips as a middle category) is accurate and reflects how it's used in the field.
Links to personality traits: The discussion of how SPS relates to other personality frameworks (Big Five, Eysenck's model, Gray's theory) correctly notes the correlations while emphasizing SPS as a distinct construct.
Environmental impacts: The podcast accurately describes how environment (especially childhood experiences) interacts with the trait to influence outcomes.
Potential outcomes: The balanced presentation of both challenges (risk for anxiety/depression in negative environments) and strengths (heightened positive emotions, creativity, empathy) associated with high sensitivity is supported by research.
One minor note: When discussing brain imaging studies, the hosts mention specific brain regions and findings that are generally accurate, but some of the connections drawn are slightly simplified versions of more complex neurological processes. This is appropriate for a general audience podcast but worth noting.
Overall, the podcast presents a scientifically sound, nuanced, and balanced view of sensory processing sensitivity that reflects current understanding in the field.
10. Image (3000 x 3000 pixels)
