USA's Global Games: Canada - Ally or Enemy?
Canadians are taking this threat seriously because while Trump's understanding of history might be remedial at best, his capacity for geopolitical chaos is graduate-level.
With every article and podcast episode, we provide comprehensive study materials: References, Executive Summary, Briefing Document, Quiz, Essay Questions, Glossary, Timeline, Cast, FAQ, Table of Contents, Index, , 3k Image, and Fact Check.
Please support my work by becoming a free subscriber. (Your subscription helps me continue providing evidence-based analysis in a media landscape increasingly hostile to inconvenient truths.)
Here we go again. Another day, another megalomaniacal pronouncement from the man who believes everything exists for his taking. This time, it's Canada that's caught in the crosshairs of American exceptionalism run amok, with Trump casually suggesting our northern neighbor should become the 51st state because, apparently, the border between the two countries is "unnatural"—just a line "drawn like with a ruler."
It's the kind of statement that would be laughable if it wasn't so revealing of the dangerous historical illiteracy that pervades American political discourse. But here's what's not funny: Canadians are taking this threat seriously, and they should. Because while Trump's understanding of history might be remedial at best, his capacity for geopolitical chaos is graduate-level.
The Myth of the Artificial Border
Let's start by demolishing the central premise of Trump's geographical fantasy. The idea that the US-Canada border is somehow artificial or arbitrary reveals a stunning ignorance of centuries of distinct historical development. This isn't just about geography—it's about fundamentally different cultural, political, and social evolution that created two genuinely separate nations.
The story begins in the early 1600s, when French settlers established a completely different colonial system in what would become Canada. While English colonists to the south were developing traditions of town meetings and representative assemblies, the French were transplanting a pre-revolutionary feudal system centered around the Catholic Church and direct dependence on the crown. Quebec was founded in 1608, Montreal in 1642—and they weren't just building trading posts. They were creating an entirely different civilization.
This isn't some minor historical footnote. French language and culture dominated Canada for centuries—English speakers didn't even outnumber Francophones until the mid-1800s. That's a fundamentally different foundation than anything happening in the thirteen American colonies.
The Revolutionary Divergence
But here's where it gets really interesting, and where Trump's "natural unity" narrative completely falls apart. When the American colonies declared independence in 1776, they absolutely expected Canada to join the fight against Britain. It seemed logical—fellow North Americans throwing off the British yoke together.
Except Canadians said no. Decisively.
Why? Because they looked at the American revolutionaries—with their anti-Catholic attitudes, their different language, their alien political culture—and thought, "Why would we trade British protection for that?" The Quebec Act of 1774 had already granted French Canadians significant religious and legal freedoms. They had guarantees for their language, their faith, their civil law. The British weren't oppressing them—they were protecting them.
When American forces actually invaded Canada in 1775, trying to force the issue militarily, they were repulsed outside Quebec City. The locals wanted nothing to do with American "liberation." This wasn't about geography or arbitrary borders—this was about fundamentally incompatible visions of society and governance.
A Pattern of American Aggression
The War of 1812 tells the same story. The Americans invaded again, attempting military annexation. The result? British forces sailed up the Potomac and burned down the White House. The war ended with the border exactly where it started—because Canadians fought to maintain their separate identity.
But American annexationist dreams didn't die there. As late as 1866—1866!—the US House of Representatives saw a bill introduced calling for the annexation of British North America. It didn't pass, but the fact that it was even proposed shows how persistent these imperial fantasies were.
Canada's response was telling: the very next year, in 1867, Britain granted Canada substantial self-governance through the British North America Act. Confederation wasn't just about Canadian nationalism—it was partly a defensive move against American expansionism.
The Shocking Truth About "Friendly" Neighbors
Here's the part that should give everyone pause: even after fighting together in World War I, even after becoming apparent allies, both countries were still planning for war against each other well into the 20th century.
In 1930, the American War Department had something called War Plan Red—a detailed strategy for invading Canada at six key locations. Canada responded with Defense Scheme Number One, which included plans for preemptive strikes against American transportation hubs and scorched earth tactics to slow any American advance.
Let that sink in. Less than a century ago, military planners on both sides were seriously contemplating armed conflict. The idea of natural unity is not just historically ignorant—it's the opposite of historical reality.
Why This Matters Now
The close partnership we see today between the US and Canada—NORAD, NATO cooperation, integrated defense—only emerged after World War II. It's relatively recent, and it was built on mutual respect for sovereignty, not on the fiction that the countries are naturally one.
When Trump casually dismisses this history, when he treats the border as an arbitrary inconvenience, he's not just being historically illiterate. He's threatening the very foundation of the modern relationship. Because that relationship is built on the recognition that these are two separate nations with distinct identities, cultures, and political systems.
The Canadian emphasis on compromise and social welfare versus American individualism isn't just a policy preference—it's the product of centuries of different historical development. The enduring influence of French culture, the British parliamentary tradition, the choice to remain outside the American revolution—these created a genuinely different political culture.
The Danger of Historical Amnesia
This isn't just about hurt feelings or diplomatic niceties. When powerful people demonstrate profound ignorance of history, when they dismiss centuries of distinct national development as arbitrary lines on a map, they create the conditions for serious geopolitical miscalculation.
Canadians understand their history in ways that apparently escape American political leadership. They know why their ancestors chose a different path. They know why the border exists where it does. They know the difference between voluntary cooperation and forced annexation.
And they're taking current threats seriously because they understand something that American exceptionalists seem to have forgotten: sovereignty isn't a gift from more powerful neighbors. It's something you fight to maintain.
The next time you hear someone dismiss the US-Canada border as artificial or unnatural, remember that you're hearing the voice of historical ignorance—ignorance that has led to conflict before and could again. Because the people on both sides of that "artificial" line know exactly why it exists, even if their would-be conquerors don't.
The border isn't artificial. The ignorance about why it exists is.
This essay is based on analysis from the Heliox podcast, where evidence meets empathy in exploring the complex historical realities that shape our modern world.
References:
Friction between Canada and the US has a long history – and potential future
Find us:
YouTube
Substack
Podcast Providers
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Patreon
FaceBook Group
STUDY MATERIALS
1. Briefing Document
Executive Summary
This briefing analyzes the historical and cultural underpinnings of the distinct national identities of Canada and the United States, in light of recent suggestions by former U.S. President Donald Trump to make Canada the 51st U.S. state. While Trump described the border as "unnatural" and "just a straight line right across the top of the country," historical evidence demonstrates a deeply rooted separation solidified by distinct colonial histories, divergent political cultures, and even military conflicts. Canada's French-speaking roots, British political influence emphasizing compromise and social welfare, and past rejections of American revolutionary movements have shaped a national character fundamentally different from the U.S. Despite periods of overt hostility and war plans, the post-World War II era marked a shift towards close security and economic cooperation, although underlying historical differences persist.
Main Themes and Key Insights
1. Trump's Vision of a Borderless North America vs. Historical Reality:
Trump's Stance: Former President Trump has repeatedly suggested making Canada the 51st U.S. state, portraying the border as "unnatural, saying: 'Someone drew that line many years ago ... like with a ruler, just a straight line right across the top of the country.'" He has indicated any union would have to be voluntary, but his statements have caused "great uncertainty" in Canada.
Historical Counterpoint: This perspective "ignores the very different histories of the two countries." The current border, particularly the 49th parallel, was established through treaties in 1818 and 1846, following various conflicts and expansions. The separation was not an arbitrary line but a consequence of distinct colonial origins, political choices, and military confrontations.
2. Divergent Historical and Cultural Trajectories:
French Colonial Roots in Canada: Canada's east coast and St. Lawrence River basin were settled by the French in the early 17th century. Quebec (1608) and Montreal (1642) were founded as part of "New France," which "transplanted its own pre-French Revolution social system featuring a government dependent on the king, a feudal system – in which so-called seigneurs leased land to settlers – and a leading role for the Catholic Church."
British Influence and Canadian Identity: After the Seven Years' War (1756-1763), France ceded New France to the British. Despite the growing number of English speakers by the mid-19th century, the "French language continued to dominate Canada for a long time."
Canadian Political Culture vs. American Individualism: "Canadian political culture emphasizes compromise and social welfare rather than the individualism and emphasis on personal responsibility prevalent in the United States." This distinction is a direct result of Canada's unique historical development, including the significant influence of its "French-speaking population and its long dependence on the British crown," which has made Canada "more European than the United States."
3. The Rejection of American Independence and the Solidification of Separation:
1776 – A Fork in the Road: When the 13 American colonies declared independence, they "hoped for support from the Canadians." However, a "clear majority of Canadians proved disinclined to join the fight. This marked the definitive division between Canada and the United States."
Reasons for Canadian Non-Participation:The Quebec Act (1774): This British Parliament act granted "considerable religious and legal freedoms to the French-speaking Catholic majority in Quebec," allowing them to "retain their language, their religion and the use of French civil law." This eliminated a key grievance that might have pushed them towards the American revolutionaries, who were often "anti-Catholic."
Lack of Self-Governance Tradition: Unlike the 13 colonies, "Canada did not have a tradition of self-governance or representative assemblies."
Elite Support for British Rule: The French-Canadian elite (seigneurs and clergy) supported the British government as a "guarantor of their privileges."
Military Deterrence: A strong British military presence and the repulsion of a 1775 American invasion attempt outside Quebec further "alienated the local population from the revolutionaries."
Post-Revolution Reinforcement: The 1783 peace treaty confirmed U.S. independence and defined the border. The migration of "pro-British loyalists from the U.S. moved to Canada, thus reinforcing the separation from the neighboring country among English speakers as well."
4. Periods of Conflict and Threat of Annexation:
War of 1812: American troops again invaded Canada, attempting to seize it, but "the attack failed." This war further cemented Canadian resistance to American absorption.
19th Century Annexation Attempts: Even after the border was defined, the "U.S. continued to lay claim to Canada." In 1866, a bill was introduced in the House of Representatives "calling for the annexation of British North America and the incorporation of its provinces into the U.S. as states and territories." This bill was not passed.
Canadian Self-Governance: To counter these American claims, in 1867, London made Canada a "largely self-governing federal state via the British North America Act," which Canadians celebrate as "the beginning of their independence."
Interwar War Plans: Despite fighting alongside each other in World War I, both nations developed secret war plans against each other in the interwar period:
"War Plan Red" (U.S., 1930): A secret strategy for a potential war against the British Empire, detailing American troops attacking Canada at "six key locations."
"Defense Scheme No. 1" (Canada, 1921): A plan to ward off a possible American attack, calling for "preemptive strike south of the border to occupy important American transportation hubs, as well as for using scorched-earth tactics."
5. Post-World War II Cooperation:
After World War II, the relationship dramatically shifted towards "close security cooperation." Key examples include:
NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command): A "joint air defense command tasked with monitoring and defending North American airspace."
NATO Membership: Both countries became close allies as members of NATO.
Conclusion
The historical narrative clearly demonstrates that the border between Canada and the United States is not, as President Trump suggested, an arbitrary line drawn "with a ruler." Instead, it is the product of centuries of distinct historical development, differing political cultures, and repeated rejections by Canadians of American overtures for union. From its French colonial heritage and British political evolution emphasizing compromise and social welfare, to its specific refusal to join the American Revolution and subsequent military defenses against U.S. incursions, Canada has forged a national identity profoundly separate from its southern neighbor. While post-WWII cooperation has fostered a strong alliance, the deep-seated historical and cultural differences continue to define the two nations.
2. Quiz & Answer Key
Quiz
Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.
What is President Trump's recent stance on Canada, and what uncertainty has it caused?
How do the historical and cultural differences between Canada and the United States challenge Trump's assertion that the border is "unnatural"?
Describe the social system established by France in its Canadian colony of New France.
Why did the majority of Canadians decline to join the American revolutionaries in 1776?
What was the significance of the Quebec Act of 1774 in shaping Canadian attitudes towards the American Revolution?
How did the War of 1812 impact the relationship and perceptions between Canada and the United States?
What motivated London to pass the British North America Act in 1867, and what was its significance for Canada?
Briefly describe "War Plan Red" and "Defense Scheme No. 1" and what they reveal about US-Canada relations in the interwar period.
How did the post-World War II era mark a significant shift in US-Canada relations?
What does the continued existence of NORAD symbolize about the contemporary security relationship between the two nations?
Answer Key
President Trump has publicly stated his desire to make Canada the 51st U.S. state, portraying the border as artificial. These statements have created significant uncertainty and concern among Canadians, despite Trump's assurance that any union would be voluntary.
Canada's French-speaking roots, its historical dependence on the British crown, and its political culture emphasizing compromise and social welfare starkly contrast with the U.S.'s individualism and emphasis on personal responsibility. These deep-seated differences demonstrate that the two nations developed distinct identities, making the border a natural consequence of their unique histories.
In New France, France transplanted a pre-French Revolution social system. This system featured a government dependent on the king, a feudal system where seigneurs leased land to settlers, and a prominent role for the Catholic Church.
Canadians opted not to join the American revolutionaries primarily due to the Quebec Act of 1774, which granted significant religious and legal freedoms to the French-speaking Catholic majority. Additionally, Canadians lacked a tradition of self-governance and their elite supported the British, who guaranteed their privileges and maintained a strong military presence.
The Quebec Act of 1774 was crucial because it allowed Francophone Catholics to retain their language, religion, and French civil law. This eliminated a key grievance that might have pushed them towards the American revolutionaries, who were largely English-speaking and often anti-Catholic.
The War of 1812 further solidified the division between the two nations, as American attempts to seize Canada failed and reinforced Canadian resolve against annexation. The British burning of Washington D.C. also highlighted the ongoing tensions, though the prewar border was ultimately restored.
London passed the British North America Act in 1867 to counter persistent American claims and annexation desires over British North America. This act made Canada a largely self-governing federal state, which Canadians celebrate as the beginning of their independence and a direct response to US pressure.
"War Plan Red" (US, 1930) was a secret strategy for a possible war against the British Empire, including attacking Canada at six key locations. "Defense Scheme No. 1" (Canada, 1921) was Canada's preemptive plan to ward off an American attack by occupying US transportation hubs and employing scorched-earth tactics. These plans reveal that despite improved WWI relations, significant mutual distrust and preparedness for conflict persisted in the interwar period.
After World War II, the two countries transitioned from planning for potential conflict to close security cooperation. This shift was marked by the establishment of NORAD for joint air defense and their collaborative efforts as NATO members.
The continued existence of NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) symbolizes the deep, cooperative security relationship between the US and Canada. It represents a shared commitment to monitoring and defending North American airspace, highlighting a strategic alliance that replaced historical adversarial tensions.
3. Essay Questions
Analyze the historical and cultural factors that contributed to the definitive division between Canada and the United States following the American Declaration of Independence in 1776. Discuss how these differences continue to shape the distinct national identities of each country.
Trace the evolution of the US-Canada border, from its initial establishment to the "49th latitude" agreement. How did military conflicts and diplomatic treaties, such as the War of 1812 and the Peace of Ghent, influence the solidification of this boundary?
Despite periods of close cooperation, the United States and Canada developed elaborate war plans against each other in the interwar period. Discuss the motivations behind "War Plan Red" and "Defense Scheme No. 1" and what these plans reveal about the underlying geopolitical anxieties between the two nations at that time.
Evaluate President Trump's suggestion of making Canada the 51st U.S. state in light of the historical narrative presented in the source. Why does the source suggest Trump's portrayal of Canadians and Americans as "one nation arbitrarily divided" ignores fundamental historical realities?
Compare and contrast the political cultures of Canada and the United States as described in the text. How have their differing approaches to governance, social welfare, and individualism contributed to their distinct national developments?
4. Glossary of Key Terms
British North America Act (1867): A landmark act passed by the British Parliament that made Canada a largely self-governing federal state, often celebrated by Canadians as the beginning of their independence. It was partly enacted to counter American claims over British North America.
Defense Scheme No. 1: A secret Canadian military plan developed by 1921, outlining strategies to defend against a possible American attack, including preemptive strikes and scorched-earth tactics.
Feudal System: A social system prevalent in New France, transplanted from pre-French Revolution France, where a king-dependent government oversaw seigneurs who leased land to settlers.
Kanata: An Iroquoian word for "settlement," from which the name "Canada" originated.
Loyalists: Pro-British individuals from the thirteen American colonies who relocated to Canada after the American Declaration of Independence in 1776 and the subsequent peace treaty in 1783, reinforcing the separation between the two nations.
New France: The territory colonized by France in North America, including Quebec and Montreal, which transplanted a pre-French Revolution social system.
North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD): A joint US-Canadian air defense command established after World War II, tasked with monitoring and defending North American airspace, symbolizing close post-war security cooperation.
Peace of Ghent (1814): The treaty that ended the War of 1812 between the United States and Great Britain, restoring the pre-war border between the US and Canada.
Quebec Act (1774): A British Parliament act that granted considerable religious and legal freedoms to the French-speaking Catholic majority in Quebec, allowing them to retain their language, religion, and French civil law, and influencing their decision not to join the American Revolution.
Seigneurs: In the feudal system of New France, these were individuals who leased land to settlers, holding a privileged position within the social structure.
Seven Years' War (1756-1763): A global conflict between major European powers, after which France ceded its colony of New France to the British.
War Plan Red: A secret American military strategy drawn up in 1930 for a possible war against the British Empire, including plans for American troops to attack Canada at six key locations.
5. Timeline of Main Events
16th Century:
1541: French explorer Jacques Cartier attempts to found a settlement at the site of present-day Quebec, but is forced to abandon it.
Late 16th Century: The word "kanata" (Iroquoian for settlement) is introduced by Jacques Cartier and becomes the origin of the name "Canada."
Early 17th Century:
Early 17th Century: France begins settling Canada's east coast and the St. Lawrence River basin.
Early 17th Century: The 13 American colonies, which will later form the United States, are established further south.
1608: Quebec is founded by the French.
1642: Montreal is founded by the French.
Mid-18th Century:
1756-1763: The Seven Years' War takes place between major European powers.
After the Seven Years' War: France cedes its colony of New France to the British.
1774: The British Parliament passes the Quebec Act, granting significant religious and legal freedoms to the French-speaking Catholic majority in Quebec, allowing them to retain their language, religion, and French civil law.
1775: American independence fighters attempt a military invasion of Canada, which is repulsed by the British and local militia outside Quebec.
Late 18th Century:
1776: The 13 American colonies declare their independence, hoping for Canadian support against the British, but most Canadians decline to join. This marks the definitive division between Canada and the United States.
1783: In a peace treaty with the 13 colonies, the British confirm their independence and establish the border with Canada in the east as far as the Mississippi River. Numerous pro-British loyalists from the U.S. move to Canada, reinforcing the separation.
Early 19th Century:
Middle of the 19th Century (approx.): English speakers in Canada begin to outnumber Francophones.
1812: The U.S. declares war on the British, and American troops invade Canada again in an attempt to seize it, but the attack fails.
August 1814: British troops succeed in sailing up the Potomac River, capturing Washington, D.C., and burning down the White House.
1814: The Peace of Ghent restores the pre-war border.
1818: The 49th latitude is agreed upon as part of the Canadian-American border definition between the Mississippi River and the Pacific Ocean.
Mid-19th Century:
1846: The 49th latitude is further agreed upon in a second treaty, completing the definition of the border between the Mississippi River and the Pacific Ocean.
1866: A bill is introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives calling for the annexation of British North America and its incorporation into the U.S. as states and territories (the bill is never passed).
1867: To counter American claims, London makes Canada a largely self-governing federal state via the British North America Act, which Canadians celebrate as the beginning of their independence.
Late 19th - Early 20th Centuries:
Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries: The threat of war between the U.S. and Canada recedes, with Canada becoming more concerned about economic pressure.
World War I: The two countries fight side by side, which improves relations.
Interwar Period: Despite improved relations, both countries develop secret war plans against each other.
1921: Canada introduces its "Defense Scheme No. 1," a plan to preemptively strike south of the border and use scorched-earth tactics in case of an American attack.
1930: The American War Department draws up "War Plan Red," a secret strategy for a possible war against the British Empire, including attacks on Canada.
Post-World War II Era:
After World War II: The U.S. and Canada enter into close security cooperation.
Post-WWII: They establish the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), a joint air defense command.
Post-WWII: They also work closely together as NATO members.
1986: Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and U.S. President Ronald Reagan sign an extension of the NORAD Agreement.
Present Day:
Current (After Trump's reelection): U.S. President Donald Trump repeatedly states publicly that he wants to make Canada the 51st U.S. state, causing uncertainty in Canada. Trump describes the border as unnatural and arbitrarily drawn.
Cast of Characters
Key Political Figures (Current/Recent):
Donald Trump: Current (as of the article's context, after his reelection) U.S. President. He has publicly suggested making Canada the 51st U.S. state and views the border as artificial.
Mark Carney: Current Canadian Prime Minister (as of the article's context). He met with President Trump in the Oval Office regarding the proposed union.
Ronald Reagan: Former U.S. President. Signed an extension of the NORAD Agreement with Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in 1986.
Brian Mulroney: Former Canadian Prime Minister. Signed an extension of the NORAD Agreement with U.S. President Ronald Reagan in 1986.
Historical Figures:
Jacques Cartier: French explorer in the 16th century who introduced the Iroquoian word "kanata" (settlement), which became the origin of "Canada." He also attempted an early settlement at Quebec.
Groups/Entities:
French-speaking population of Canada (Francophones): A significant cultural and linguistic group in Canada, especially in Quebec, whose unique history and culture have shaped Canada's distinct identity. They were granted significant freedoms by the Quebec Act in 1774.
English-speaking settlers/Canadians (Anglophones): Settlers who came to Canada, initially to the coast and later the Great Lakes region. They eventually outnumbered Francophones by the mid-19th century. Many pro-British loyalists from the U.S. moved to Canada after American independence.
American Revolutionaries/Independence Fighters: The colonists who declared independence from Great Britain in 1776 and fought for the formation of the United States. They attempted a military invasion of Canada in 1775.
British Crown/Government/Parliament: The ruling authority of Great Britain, which controlled Canada (New France after 1763) and the 13 American colonies. They passed the Quebec Act and later granted Canada self-governance through the British North America Act.
Siegneurs: French feudal lords in New France who leased land to settlers. Part of the French-Canadian elite who supported the British government to maintain their privileges.
Catholic Church (in New France/Quebec): Played a leading role in the social system transplanted by France to New France. The French-speaking Catholic majority in Quebec was granted religious freedoms by the British.
Loyalists (pro-British): Individuals from the American colonies who remained loyal to the British Crown during and after the American Revolution, many of whom migrated to Canada.
American War Department (later Department of Defense): U.S. government entity responsible for military planning. Drew up "War Plan Red" in 1930 for a potential war against the British Empire, including attacks on Canada.
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization): A military alliance formed after World War II, of which both the U.S. and Canada are members, leading to close cooperation.
NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command): A joint U.S.-Canada air defense command established after World War II, tasked with monitoring and defending North American airspace.
6. FAQ
Q1: What is President Trump's recent proposal regarding Canada, and how is it perceived by Canadians?
President Trump has publicly suggested making Canada the 51st U.S. state, describing the border between the two countries as "unnatural" and arbitrarily drawn. While he stated any union would have to be voluntary, Canadians are taking this proposition seriously, and his statements have caused significant uncertainty in Canada.
Q2: How do the historical and cultural roots of Canada and the United States differ?
The histories and cultures of Canada and the United States have diverged significantly. Canada has deep French-speaking roots, established by French settlers in the early 17th century (e.g., Quebec in 1608, Montreal in 1642). This led to a pre-French Revolution social system with a feudal structure and a strong role for the Catholic Church. Canada also maintained a long dependence on the British crown. In contrast, the 13 American colonies, established around the same time, developed a culture emphasizing individualism and personal responsibility. Canadian political culture generally prioritizes compromise and social welfare, making it "more European" than the United States.
Q3: Why did Canada choose not to join the American independence movement in 1776?
Canadians largely declined to join the American revolutionaries for several reasons. The British Parliament passed the Quebec Act in 1774, granting significant religious and legal freedoms to the French-speaking Catholic majority in Quebec, allowing them to retain their language, religion, and French civil law. This gave them little incentive to ally with the predominantly English-speaking and often anti-Catholic American revolutionaries. Furthermore, Canada lacked a tradition of self-governance, and its French-Canadian elite (seigneurs and clergy) supported the British government, which guaranteed their privileges. A British military presence also deterred potential revolutionaries, and an American invasion attempt in 1775 was repelled, further alienating Canadians.
Q4: How was the present-day US-Canada border established, and why does Trump criticize it?
The border's origins trace back to the British peace treaty with the 13 colonies in 1783, which established the eastern border up to the Mississippi River. As settlers moved west, the 49th latitude was agreed upon in two treaties in 1818 and 1846 to define the border between the Mississippi River and the Pacific Ocean. This 49th parallel is the "straight line" that President Trump objects to, claiming it was drawn "like with a ruler."
Q5: Were there any military conflicts or threats of conflict between the US and Canada after their respective formations?
Yes, despite later cooperation, there were notable conflicts and threats. The U.S. attempted military invasions of Canada in 1775 (during the American Revolution) and again in 1812. Both attempts failed, and in the latter, British forces retaliated by burning Washington, D.C. Even in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, both nations developed secret war plans against each other. The U.S. had "War Plan Red" (1930) outlining attacks on Canada, while Canada had "Defense Scheme No. 1" (1921) planning preemptive strikes and scorched-earth tactics.
Q6: How did Canada gain greater self-governance from Britain, partly in response to US ambitions?
In 1866, a bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives calling for the annexation of British North America. To counter these American claims, London made Canada a largely self-governing federal state the following year through the British North America Act. Canadians celebrate this as the beginning of their independence.
Q7: What marked the shift towards close cooperation between the US and Canada, and what are examples of this cooperation?
Close cooperation between the two countries largely began after World War II. They established the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), a joint air defense command for monitoring and defending North American airspace. They also work closely together as NATO members, indicating a strong security alliance that contrasts with their earlier tensions and war planning.
Q8: Beyond military and political differences, what fundamental cultural distinctions are highlighted between Canada and the United States?
Beyond military and political separations, a core cultural distinction lies in their societal values. Canadian political culture emphasizes compromise and social welfare, reflecting its European and French roots. In contrast, the United States is characterized by a prevalence of individualism and an emphasis on personal responsibility. These differing priorities have shaped their respective national identities over centuries.
7. Table of Contents
Introduction & Context — 0:00
Setting up Trump's claims about Canada as the 51st state and the "unnatural" border drawn "like with a ruler"
The Myth of the Artificial Border — 2:15
Examining the claim that the US-Canada border is arbitrary and challenging this perspective with historical evidence
Early Colonial Foundations — 4:30
French settlement patterns from 1608 onwards, establishment of Quebec and Montreal, and the transplantation of feudal systems
Cultural and Political Divergence — 7:45
How French and British influences created fundamentally different social systems compared to the American colonies
The Revolutionary Choice — 11:20
Why Canadians chose not to join the American Revolution despite expectations, including the Quebec Act of 1774
Military Conflicts and Failed Annexations — 15:30
The War of 1812, American invasion attempts, and the burning of Washington D.C.
Border Definition Through Diplomacy — 19:45
Treaties of 1818 and 1846 establishing the 49th parallel and the true meaning of "drawn with a ruler"
Persistent American Ambitions — 22:10
The 1866 House bill for annexation and Canada's defensive response through Confederation in 1867
The Shocking Interwar Military Plans — 25:30
War Plan Red (1930) and Defense Scheme Number One (1921) - detailed invasion and defense strategies
Modern Alliance Formation — 29:15
Post-WWII transformation including NORAD and NATO cooperation that created today's partnership
Understanding the Deep Differences — 32:00
How centuries of distinct development created genuinely different political cultures and national identities
Conclusion: Why History Matters — 35:20
The significance of understanding this complex history for interpreting modern political statements and threats
Closing Thoughts — 37:45
Reflection on how historical roots continue to influence contemporary US-Canada relations
8. Index
American Revolution — 11:20, 15:30
Annexation — 11:20, 15:30, 22:10
Anti-Catholic attitude — 11:20
Border — 2:15, 15:30, 19:45
British Crown — 4:30, 11:20
British North America Act — 22:10
Canada — 0:00, 2:15, 4:30
Canadian political culture — 4:30, 32:00
Carney, Mark — 0:00
Catholic Church — 4:30, 11:20
Confederation — 22:10
Cultural differences — 4:30, 32:00
Defense Scheme Number One — 25:30
English speakers — 7:45
European influence — 4:30
Feudal system — 4:30
49th parallel — 19:45
France — 4:30
Francophones — 7:45
French Canada — 4:30, 7:45, 11:20
French civil law — 11:20
French language — 4:30, 7:45, 11:20
Great Lakes — 7:45
House of Representatives — 22:10
Individualism — 4:30, 32:00
Invasion — 15:30, 25:30
Iroquoian — 7:45
Jacques Cartier — 7:45
Kanata — 7:45
Loyalists — 15:30
Military presence — 11:20
Montreal — 4:30
NATO — 29:15
New France — 4:30
NORAD — 29:15
Ontario — 7:45
Peace of Ghent — 15:30
Potomac — 15:30
Preemptive strike — 25:30
Quebec — 4:30, 11:20
Quebec Act — 11:20
Quebec City — 11:20
Representative assemblies — 11:20
Revolution — 11:20, 15:30
Scorched earth — 25:30
Seigneurs — 11:20
Seven Years War — 11:20
Social welfare — 4:30, 32:00
St. Lawrence River — 4:30
Thirteen colonies — 4:30, 11:20
Treaties — 19:45
Trump, President — 0:00, 2:15
Unnatural border — 0:00, 2:15
War of 1812 — 15:30
War Plan Red — 25:30
Washington D.C. — 15:30
White House — 15:30
World War I — 25:30
World War II — 29:15
9. Post-Episode Fact Check
VERIFIED ACCURATE:
✅ Trump's Recent Comments: Trump has indeed repeatedly made statements about Canada becoming the 51st state and described the border as "artificially drawn" Trump’s remarks on Canada becoming the 51st state raise a lot of questions | AP News +2
✅ Mark Carney Meeting: Prime Minister Mark Carney did meet with Trump at the White House and rejected the 51st state proposal Trump’s 51st state vision—what it would mean for Canada and the U.S. | Fraser Institute +2
✅ War Plan Red (1930): War Plan Red was a real US military plan from 1930 for potential war with the British Empire, including invasion of Canada WikipediaBrilliant Maps
✅ Defence Scheme No. 1 (1921): Canada did have Defense Scheme No. 1, developed in 1921, which included plans for preemptive strikes against the US WikipediaMPR News
HISTORICALLY ACCURATE (Based on standard historical sources):
French settlement dates (Quebec 1608, Montreal 1642)
Quebec Act of 1774 providing religious freedoms
American Revolution and Canadian non-participation
War of 1812 events including burning of Washington
1866 US House annexation bill
1867 British North America Act/Confederation
Treaties establishing 49th parallel (1818, 1846)
Formation of NORAD and NATO cooperation post-WWII
ASSESSMENT: The podcast's historical claims are factually accurate and well-supported by documented evidence. The contemporary political context regarding Trump's statements is current and verified through multiple news sources.
10. Image (3000 x 3000 pixels)
