Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ray Andrews's avatar

> You can't solve a biological problem with moral judgments and shame.

Sure you can. Addiction is a problem in my family. When it has been overcome is was not by throwing in the towel and saying: "This isn't my fault, I can't help it, I was born this way." But by doing just the opposite: "I am the master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul." ... By taking command of oneself and digging deep for the willpower to overcome.

> There's an FDA-approved drug

No doubt. Perhaps you look forward to the day when people are passive sacks of biochemistry and whenever you want to change what's going on in that sack you do it with chemistry. AstraZeneca to the rescue. As with mandatory vaccines we can look forward to the day when your weekly mandatory injection will include chemical solutions to whatever it is that the government doesn't like about you.

> Some people are born more vulnerable than others.

True. So they have to work harder. I'm dyslexic, I have to work harder when it comes to spelling. I'm left handed, using a drillpress is harder for me. Life is not fair, never has been, never will be.

> Because the science is clear – addiction isn't about moral failure.

Science has nothing to say about moral questions.

> For decades, we've been fed the same tired narrative: addiction is about bad choices, weak willpower, and moral failure.

Actually for the last many decades the older, sterner view has been unfashionable and your 'modern' view has been the orthodoxy: Nobody is responsible for anything. Not addicts for their addiction, not criminals for their crime, not the obese for their weight, not pedophiles for molesting the kids. Ask nothing from anybody, just understand that whatever they do is not their fault. We are all helpless infants held in the tender, loving arms of the government. So don't blame me for disagreeing with you, my brain made me do it ;-)

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts